| General Category > General Discussion |
| What Should I Scan First? |
| << < (4/4) |
| Arseen:
--- Quote from: tiktektak on June 02, 2011, 02:33:04 AM ---Come on people don't resurrect year old threads withouth any purpose and Arseen don't jump on the boat would ya? ::) --- End quote --- 1. This was OKish bump because of the long list of scan provitable, he of course could have started new topic. 2. My posts just pointed out that don't get your hopes up, and didn't bumb this topic as it already was #1 on the list. 3. Your post how ever did bumb this topic ... ;) But yes bumbing old topics is usually useless, just start new topic or post in relevant existing topic. |
| tiktektak:
--- Quote from: Arseen on June 02, 2011, 03:02:26 AM --- --- Quote from: tiktektak on June 02, 2011, 02:33:04 AM ---Come on people don't resurrect year old threads withouth any purpose and Arseen don't jump on the boat would ya? ::) --- End quote --- 1. This was OKish bump because of the long list of scan provitable, he of course could have started new topic. NO it was not because the thread is over a year old and the user whose scans it talks about doesn't exist anymore! So what purpose has the !bump!? None at all. 2. My posts just pointed out that don't get your hopes up, and didn't bumb this topic as it already was #1 on the list. It's not about bumping it again it's about that a forum responsible admin should not answer such a useless post like everything is allright BUT tell the new guy that this bump was unneccessary and that he should please consider not doing such a thing again. 3. Your post how ever did bumb this topic ... ;) See my answer to point 2. But yes bumbing old topics is usually useless, just start new topic or post in relevant existing topic. --- End quote --- |
| Arseen:
1. This was OKish bump because of the long list of scan provitable, he of course could have started new topic. NO it was not because the thread is over a year old and the user whose scans it talks about doesn't exist anymore! So what purpose has the !bump!? None at all. Like I said, I pointed out that original scanner does not exsist no more. Purpose the new poster: Wants scan of Metal Slug. He could have made new topic, but what is the point when this topic exsists, recardless it being year old. 2. My posts just pointed out that don't get your hopes up, and didn't bumb this topic as it already was #1 on the list. It's not about bumping it again it's about that a forum responsible admin should not answer such a useless post like everything is allright BUT tell the new guy that this bump was unneccessary and that he should please consider not doing such a thing again. HMM. So it's useless to request scans for a game, if using old topic that has also list of other needed covers, but not useless with new topic. It's not OK to request raw with oold topic. But it's OK to start new topic for the same purpose. I understand your point and would react differently to real useless resurrection of old topic. But this was, or at least seems genuine request of raw for cover. But yes bumbing old topics is usually useless, just start new topic or post in relevant existing topic. |
| Mel:
@Doom Do you still have the following DS covers available to scan? Assassin's Creed: Altair's Chronicles Assassin's Creed II: Discovery Black Sigil: Blade of the Exiled Dragon Quest Monsters joker |
| Navigation |
| Message Index |
| Previous page |