| General Category > General Discussion |
| Future Classic/ Mini series? |
| << < (2/4) > >> |
| pringlesman:
Conkers and Goldeneye definitely won't happen. They are owned by Rare which is owned by Microsoft. |
| amace04:
--- Quote from: pringlesman on October 07, 2017, 05:16:41 PM ---Conkers and Goldeneye definitely won't happen. They are owned by Rare which is owned by Microsoft. --- End quote --- So is donkey Kong |
| TDIRunner:
Getting Goldeneye on an N64 Mini would be the unlikely equivalent to getting Star Fox 2 on an SNES Mini. |
| Megatron:
--- Quote from: TDIRunner on October 07, 2017, 11:58:04 PM ---Getting Goldeneye on an N64 Mini would be the unlikely equivalent to getting Star Fox 2 on an SNES Mini. --- End quote --- The problem with GoldenEye is that you would not only have to pay royalties to rare, you would also have to obtain permission to use the likenesses of all the actors in the game. It's the same reason why there are two versions of punch out, once the contract with Mike Tyson expired Nintendo wasn't about to shell out the money to do it again. |
| wiggy:
--- Quote from: pringlesman on October 07, 2017, 05:16:41 PM ---Conkers and Goldeneye definitely won't happen. They are owned by Rare which is owned by Microsoft. --- End quote --- This. --- Quote from: amace04 on October 07, 2017, 11:30:20 PM --- --- Quote from: pringlesman on October 07, 2017, 05:16:41 PM ---Conkers and Goldeneye definitely won't happen. They are owned by Rare which is owned by Microsoft. --- End quote --- So is donkey Kong --- End quote --- That's like saying Zelda Oracle of Ages/Seasons are owned by Capcom. Rare developed DK64 FOR Nintendo, not for Rareware. --- Quote from: TDIRunner on October 07, 2017, 11:58:04 PM ---Getting Goldeneye on an N64 Mini would be the unlikely equivalent to getting Star Fox 2 on an SNES Mini. --- End quote --- There's a LOT of licensing involved with that one. It's not the same as simply publishing a Nintendo-owned game. |
| Navigation |
| Message Index |
| Next page |
| Previous page |