| General Category > General Discussion |
| 4K TVs.. waste of time? |
| << < (6/16) > >> |
| KalessinDB:
--- Quote from: marioxb on September 11, 2015, 10:10:15 PM --- I cannot stand when it looks so real thay you are on set with the actors. Looks sooooo damn fake. --- End quote --- I do understand what you're trying to say, but my goodness that's an amazing quote right there. |
| marioxb:
I know its kinda contradictory "so real that it's fake". I want it to look like a movie, not real life. |
| Megatron:
--- Quote from: marioxb on September 11, 2015, 10:10:15 PM ---But see, that's the thing. I don't want to be "there". I want to be watching the movie, not in it. I cannot stand when it looks so real that you are on set with the actors. Looks sooooo damn fake. --- End quote --- I'm so spoiled that if my movies DONT look like this, I immediately am disinterested. Or at least put in to a "meh" mood by it. The James Bond blu rays showed it was possible for almost anything to look like this, so when a 2015 film only looks OK by comparisson, I tend to immediately care less about it. But I'm a videophile. I notice 1080 p vs 1080i, 240 vs 120 fps, etc. So my opinion is a bit biased. |
| palmer6strings:
Sooo.... Does that mean you like to molest movies?? |
| Megatron:
--- Quote from: palmer6strings on September 11, 2015, 11:36:53 PM ---Sooo.... Does that mean you like to molest movies?? --- End quote --- Surprisingly there is no paraphilia denoted to sex with inanimate objects other than the word "fetishism" pared with the specific object. There is spectrophilia, which is a sexual attraction to ghosts...yet nothing for objects. Go figure. That said, I'm neither confirming nor denying anything, just clarifying the terminology. |
| Navigation |
| Message Index |
| Next page |
| Previous page |