General Category > General Discussion
When collecting: Go for the big ticket or little tickets first?
(1/4) > >>
Einhander:
Let's say you want this game that costs 200 bucks. You want it a 10 on a scale of 1 to 10, even though there's no practical reason to have it, but you just do. Or you could go out and get multiple games for the same money. Some of them you like better than others. The problem though is that you still have that one game on your mind. I'm trying to make a choice right now. I'm thinking it's better to collect the big ticket first and then get the lesser ones over time. So, I usually make a list and write out how much I want each game on a scale of 1-10. And I go for the big ones first and work my way down. Do you work your way up? What's the better way to collect or does it vary depending on the situation? Of course when you first get into collecting, you should always get a bunch of games in any way if you have none to play for any system. But eventually it should become about being more precise in selecting and not just getting more.
SegaNomadman:
Personally, if it's something I've been saving for and my sights are set on it, I get it knowing I can get the lesser stuff later. But really it depends on your preference.
tiamaxwell:
I normally save up for the expensive ones I NEED to have. Otherwise I hunt in the wild.
kingjohn3:
Is it a quality game? Sorta like Secret Scout vs Little Samson. Both are expensive but one is much better than the other. So if the game is high quality and you really want it then get it but I'd wait til everything else is collected.
Einhander:

--- Quote from: Sega Nomadman on December 19, 2014, 10:25:20 PM ---Personally, if it's something I've been saving for and my sights are set on it, I get it knowing I can get the lesser stuff later. But really it depends on your preference.

--- End quote ---

Thanks. I think that's what I'm going to do. Get the one I've had my sight set on and get the lesser stuff later.
Navigation
Message Index
Next page

Go to full version