General Category > General Discussion
Percentage of completion for NES
tiktektak:
--- Quote from: Blumpkin on September 19, 2013, 08:01:19 PM ---
--- Quote from: tiktektak on September 19, 2013, 12:18:44 PM ---Not again....
--- End quote ---
Well, anybody new to the site only knows what's presented on the cover. If half the features on the menu bar don't work then they should be removed.
What TCP has is a toolbox with all the places for the tools labeled, but no actual tools.
--- End quote ---
Well, anybody new to the site should read up on the most common topics and then start opening his mouth and talk about things he clearly has no clue about.
Bear78:
--- Quote from: larryinc64 on September 20, 2013, 07:31:54 AM ---The bad covers were uploaded from before the quality guidelines were put in place, they can't be removed, only replaced, so until the cover has a better replacement, they have to stay.
--- End quote ---
Thanks Larry, I actually did NOT know about this which explains a lot. I HAVE seen the quality argument threads in the past and I completely understand why the high standards are in place. I also see what I consider great work get passed up and never uploaded. Maybe they don't meet the standards (I don't know what the exact standards are). My post was meant to point out that maybe people don't upload new raws for some of the reasons I posted and why we don't have some collections (even smaller ones) complete.
@videogametrader, I don't have my a thread for just my raw scans as I try and post them in the general threads (ex: http://www.thecoverproject.net/forums/index.php?topic=4118.msg97261#msg97261 ) I think some of my older scans were not up to par as to what people are looking for but I do believe my more recent ones are pretty good quality.
@TikTekTak, I guess I'm still fairly new around here (registered in 2011 but mostly lurk) but I remember when I found this site I found it hard to find the covers I wanted either because they were not hosted on the site or because the ones that were, were low quality or not what I wanted. I was forced to come into the forums (not a bad thing necessarily) to find what I was looking for. So I would have to say, I agree with Blumpkin. I was presented with a great site for covers on the surface (the links on the left) but since I couldn't find what I was looking for I had to dig for it. And I DID read the FAQs before posting any thing on this site including the general FAQ (http://www.thecoverproject.net/forums/index.php?topic=4289.0)... maybe it should be updated with "don't complain about quality"
e_brugal:
@ Arseen: Did you check a PM that i send you?
Arseen:
--- Quote from: e_brugal on September 20, 2013, 07:29:11 PM ---@ Arseen: Did you check a PM that i send you?
--- End quote ---
Yep, answer will be just bit long and didn't have time to type at work.
I'll continue soon. ;D
videogametrader:
--- Quote from: Bear78 on September 20, 2013, 07:17:26 PM ---
@videogametrader, I don't have my a thread for just my raw scans as I try and post them in the general threads (ex: http://www.thecoverproject.net/forums/index.php?topic=4118.msg97261#msg97261 ) I think some of my older scans were not up to par as to what people are looking for but I do believe my more recent ones are pretty good quality.
--- End quote ---
Since you are using box.com to store the raws. Why not place everything in a folder and share the folder in your sig? This way when you post a raw in the general posts, someone can just click the link to see all of your scans.