| General Category > General Discussion |
| Cover Quality Discussion |
| << < (9/25) > >> |
| Azarkhel:
--- Quote from: shenske on July 03, 2013, 04:03:19 PM --- --- Quote from: pumanchero on July 03, 2013, 03:52:44 PM ---I 100% support the "placeholder" category to be implemented. Better that than nothing. --- End quote --- Sorry to put it bluntly but we are simply not going to do that. Cover should be made right the first time, if the cover can not be made right then it belongs in the forums. --- End quote --- Agreed. I can see this "placeholder" idea as basically opening the floodgates. |
| sheep2001:
We've got this really neat groundbreaking tool called ...oh what was. It again...it's really new...never seen it before......oh that's it..'search'. |
| shenske:
--- Quote from: FritzWhite on July 03, 2013, 04:05:53 PM ---I appreciate the quality stuff and the standards, but it's just kind of kind of hard to find covers sometimes in the forums. Some of the threads are over a 100 pages. --- End quote --- The artist should have made it the correct way the first time instead of being lazy. :-\ |
| Rx_79:
I dont see a "placeholder" as opening the floodgates. And It might push people to make a better version. People will think like I can make one better than that. but I sorta disagree with It, because it just means more work for Admins. Its easy enough to click something approved but with the placeholder they would have to do a comparison. |
| sheep2001:
Placeholders remain searchable on the threads. They won't be hosted. Full stop. Cdcovers.cc or cover galaxy are full of place holders |
| Navigation |
| Message Index |
| Next page |
| Previous page |