General Category > General Discussion
New Site Feedback
palmer6strings:
Kind of getting back on topic, the new covers in the middle seem kind of small to me, if you double their size it would fill out the page quite a bit better IMO.
Snowcone:
--- Quote from: palmer6strings on June 27, 2013, 08:07:38 AM ---Kind of getting back on topic, the new covers in the middle seem kind of small to me, if you double their size it would fill out the page quite a bit better IMO.
--- End quote ---
The size of the images scale based on your screen resolution. You can see the page on my computer at 1663px wide vs 961px wide:
Azarkhel:
New design looks fine to me as a splash page, clean quite easy to navigate. Only criticism would be that having the console categories smashed up hard against the left looks a little rough. Bring that column in a bit, give it some breathing room.
Arseen:
--- Quote from: shenske on June 27, 2013, 08:03:36 AM ---
--- Quote from: Arseen on June 27, 2013, 06:54:13 AM ---
--- Quote from: segamer on June 26, 2013, 06:19:11 PM ---This Super Bonk cover was uploaded last month and it doesn't meet site standards. (http://www.thecoverproject.net/view.php?cover_id=13207)
Where as this cover for Super Bonk has been on the forums for over a year (http://www.mediafire.com/view/?s5ztvcdnaqjbehz). Meets sites standards 100%.
So things are a bit skewed.
--- End quote ---
I so 100% agree with you on this.
But there is natural explanation on this... not gonna say it... but I think atleast 2 members should check cover before adding it... for this obvious reason.
--- End quote ---
It doesn't happen often, its pretty rare when one slips through. With the way all of our (admins) schedules line up it would be redundant and no offense but a waste of time to have two admins checking every file.
--- End quote ---
It was polite way of saing that If admin is about to post his own cover other admin should check it too...
palmer6strings:
Ah ok I gotcha, ya I'm just on my phone, guess I need to check it on my computer. :P