REQUEST- two retail SNES covers

General Category > The Request Forum

<< < (9/12) > >>

Arseen:
Actually I have been nagging about the SNES template once in a while.

And I'm using updated template that has some bits better, see: Super Tetris 3:

--- Quote from: Arseen on September 27, 2012, 11:54:02 AM ---Super Tetris 3

--- End quote ---

shenske:
I'm sorry you have an outdated version of the template. Try redownloading from our templates page :)

segamer:
I just joined a two months ago. I've only downloaded the template recently. I would imaging most of the work posted on this site is with the outdated template. Why aren't you complaining? If the tetris 3 templete is the newer template. The imperfections I just pointed out are still there, with the exception of the seal of quality. The entire back is... um.... stretched and low rez. Below your standard.

segamer:
The NES Section Z cover that was posted on October 29th, 2012

OMG, the resolution is lower than the Wolfchild cover I posted but for some reason it's acceptable. Can someone say hypocrisy! The thing that is shocking is I didn't zoom in that much. The zoom you did on Wolfchild is far greater.

How embarrassing. Judging... Complaining about others work... ...for not meeting an imaginary standard.

OMG, such a substandard resolution. It's so much lower than the covers I just posted.

Pride comes before a fall...

BadChad:
Im going to have to disagree with you on the NES cover, and agree with what shenske pointed out about your Wolfchild cover. He knows what hes talking about. I was actually the one who approved that Section Z cover and theres nothing wrong with its quality. Sure any cover will look pixelated if you zoom in enough but I dont think thats the point. Moire effect cant usually be completely repaired without washing out the details of the artwork or bringing down the overall sharpness and quality. Like shenske pointed out, theres no detail left in the fur of the wolf because its been washed out which was probably because the original art source wasnt the greatest to begin with. BTW, mobygames is NEVER a suitable site for artwork worthy of our standards...

Just comparing your wolfchild cover to our SNES wolfchild cover can show the difference, and to be honest even our SNES cover could use a few minor tweaks which would improve the overall quality.

GEN/SNES:

Looking at the two makes it clear to see the difference in detail and personally, the one on the right looks better to me.

Sure it can be upsetting when your cover gets turned down, but your cover was turned down for quality reasons and its not like thats something we just do around here for fun. We want covers that meet our standards so there will be no need to update them in the future. Sure we have plenty of old covers that could use updating and it seems like everybody who gets offended by our standards, runs straight for that boat (I did once when I was new around here). Things have changed over the years and quality standards have improved and theres nothing wrong with that. And personally, Im happy for that because it pushed me to make better quality work and now Im a cover admin whos made plenty of high quality covers for everyone to enjoy. If your cover doesnt meet our standards but is still useful to others, theres nothing stopping them from enjoying it from the link you posted.

Navigation

 Message Index

Go to full version