Author Topic: GAME FOR ADVANCE?  (Read 1212 times)

April 02, 2012, 09:41:53 AM
Reply #60

UncleBob

  • *************
  • Information Offline
  • Hero Member
  • Forum Admin
  • Posts: 925
    • Email
Seems like you've already solved this problem.

As you've already discovered, it is NOT a federal offense to ship these items via carries such as UPS/FedEx, and that's what paypal/ebay may tell the buyer to do.

That is a possibility. (Though there may be some issue had with transporting counterfeit materials across state lines).

If this is the case, then demand that the buyer pay the shipping costs - up front.

Quote
Ease up on the whole "it's federal law" bit.  We're not talking about shipping hundreds of bootlegs to a retailer.  Nobody cares about a single bootleg GBA game being shipped.  There isn't a federal prosecutor or judge that would even look at a case this small.  When it comes to the law, there is no "That's not how the world works".   It's just not that black and white.

Except that it is black and white.
Now, if you're talking about if one would get caught or if one would get prosecuted - of course, that's a different story.  But the law itself is black and white.  That's why we have the great justice system we do.  Laws (generally) are clear, but prosecutors, judges and juries are there to determine intent and decide if punishment is necessary.

My point, however, is valid and would hold up in any court of law - Anyone (company or otherwise) that tries to make breaking the law a condition of an agreement is making an illegal agreement.  Period.

Quote
1st off, you cannot de-authorize your PP account without actually talking to paypal.  Again, you've signed an agreement with them.  It's very unlikely that your bank or CC company will block transactions from a specific vendor.

Which is why I've said that.  MULTIPLE TIMES.  The call is simply to lay foundation.

Quote
They will instruct you to close your account and open a new one if it's a big concern.  Even then, PP will pursue you for the money. They are relentless fucks, even with an amount as pithy as 15 bucks.

Let them.  If you're determined enough, you can then bring them to court yourself.  Especially if they attempt to attach anything to your credit record.
Want some free money?  PayPal has some pretty deep pockets.

Quote
The "big difference" is that any transfers which may take place regarding this transaction aren't going to be considered "future transactions", since the transaction itself has already taken place.

The transaction involving someone selling you counterfeit goods.  Which is something you 100% have the right to dispute and will win virtually every time.

Quote
"See how quickly they back off" and totally deny your claim is more like it.

... still waiting to hear your stories involving being duped into buying counterfeit goods.  Because I've never had this happen.

Quote
Congrats to you on winning 3 fraud dispute chargebacks.  That's not the norm when it comes to such things, but rather the exception.  Keep in mind that both Mastercard and Visa have recently re-written their fraud chargeback policies.  Filing 2 or more in a given time frame puts you under the microscope.  Just something to keep in mind.

...and still waiting. :D

Quote
I'm not trying to completely discredit your methods, Bob.  I just feel the buyer should be aware that such aggressive tactics aren't necessarily the best route for everyone to take.

Aggressive tactics are the only method that will yield results.  These resellers *know* no one will follow up on them... and that's how they get by with it.

Quote
You obviously have VERY strong feelings about bootleg games, and that obviously affects your choices regarding the resolution of a situations like these (as evidenced by you insistence on either destroying or reporting the items in question and your assertion that the chargebacks "aren't for the money".) 

Yes...  Bootleg resellers are, as far as I'm concerned, the scum of the hobby.  Now, I give a little leeway to those selling reproductions of games you can't buy (like, say, English Mother for the NES).  While I won't do business with someone like that, at least they're honest about what they're selling and they're providing a service to fans who can't get what they're looking for any other way.

But for bootleggers of common DS and GBA titles?  Screw these folks.  They're not trying to help anyone but themselves.  They're doing it in a dishonest fashion with the singular intent of ripping off everyone in the process.

As for destroying the merchandise, I do that for myself.  The goal isn't to get "free stuff" - and if you get your money back *and* keep the merchandise, then you're cheating the system in a big way.  Destroy the merchandise and you gain nothing from the entire transaction.
theunclebob@hotmail.com - 618.384.6938

April 02, 2012, 10:40:31 AM
Reply #61

wiggy

  • The one.. the only... whatever
  • **
  • Information Offline
  • Maximum Volume Poster
  • Posts: 8241
  • Extra cheese please!
    • Rose Colored Gaming
The same can be said for your repeated proclamations regarding the illegality of shipping counterfeit items via USPS.  Call the FBI regarding this transaction and see where it gets you.

These two go together really well.
Because you're attempting to make the product unusable so that you can ship it through the mail.

Without the drill hole, it's an illegal bootleg.
With the drill hole, it's a non-working replica.  A homemade trinket.

But it's still fraud.  Committing a crime in order to thwart another doesn't make it less of a crime.

Plus, as you've already pointed out yourself (and as I've highlighted earlier), there are legal means by which to return it.

My point wasn't that it's something that should be reported, but rather that your instructions were rather hypocritical.

Not sure how you get that - my instructions have been constant - do what it takes to hurt the seller.

Come on, man, you're a smart guy.

You insist that it's sooooo illegal to send a counterfeit item through the mail, then suggest the buyer himself commit fraud.  One DOES NOT negate the other. 

That spells hyp-o-crite.

Plus you're talking about taking revenge for what you feel is some heinous crime.  That's not an appropriate way to approach the situation, ever.  That makes you no better than the guy who knowingly sold counterfeit items in the first place.

April 02, 2012, 11:12:01 AM
Reply #62

wiggy

  • The one.. the only... whatever
  • **
  • Information Offline
  • Maximum Volume Poster
  • Posts: 8241
  • Extra cheese please!
    • Rose Colored Gaming
Except that it is black and white...Laws (generally) are clear, but prosecutors, judges and juries are there to determine intent and decide if punishment is necessary.

How many times have you been involved in civil and/or criminal litigation?  I'm guessing not much aside from small claims, if that.

Sorry, friend, law is absolutely NOT black and white.  It is up to interpretation, and that interpretation will vary greatly from officer to officer, prosecutor to prosecutor, judge to judge, etc.


Let them.  If you're determined enough, you can then bring them to court yourself.  Especially if they attempt to attach anything to your credit record.
Want some free money?  PayPal has some pretty deep pockets.


"Free money"?!  You have definitely never been a party to civil litigation.  Free is not a word that is USED in that context. Ever.

Of course you can try to sue anyone you like.  My point is that you would have no grounds on which to do so.


The transaction involving someone selling you counterfeit goods.  Which is something you 100% have the right to dispute and will win virtually every time.

Again, the transaction (as far as either your bank or CC are concerned) is with paypal, not the kid in FL.  Your bank/CC will not be in contact with the guy in FL, they'll be in contact with PP.  This is part of why PP is such a pain in the ass.  They are a 3rd party in every transaction that they process and it just serves to complicate disputes.


...and still waiting. Cheesy

This was empirical data, not a story.  Would you like me to post the MC/Visa chargeback agreement?  Stories are fun, but they only give an example of a single person's (limited) experience with any given topic.  That's like relying on the data from a study that only used one person to study.  You need a cross-section of MANY in order to provide truly useful data.


Aggressive tactics are the only method that will yield results.  These resellers *know* no one will follow up on them... and that's how they get by with it.

In your experience.  That has not been my experience 100% of the time, by any stretch of the imagination.  Have I ever needed to be aggressive in order to get what I feel I was owed?  Yes.  Do I start off from that position every time.  No fucking way.  Sometimes that sort of attitude will get you the middle finger and a door slammed in your face.


Yes...  Bootleg resellers are, as far as I'm concerned, the scum of the hobby.  

I'm not a person fan of theirs either.  But, they are human beings.  Treating them the same way (or worse) than they treated you just makes you as much of a scum bag in my opinion.

Now, I give a little leeway to those selling reproductions of games you can't buy (like, say, English Mother for the NES).

Why?  One is hardly different from the other according to your black and white way of thinking.  

This is actually an excellent example of how laws are NOT black and white.  Your forgiveness in this instance is fairly consistent with the laws regarding this sort of thing.  Why do you think there are so many sites selling repros and nearly none selling straight up bootlegs?  This is because there is a LOT of gray area.  In fact there's even a term for this sort of product, "gray market".








April 02, 2012, 11:15:36 AM
Reply #63

sheep2001

  • I have no label. Maybe I'm not a gamer at all?
  • *
  • Information Offline
  • Post Whore
  • Cover Admin
  • Posts: 5803
    • www.pechluna.com
all this fuss over someone selling an OBVIOUS fake.

He hasn't made it, its a dodgy Chinese "GAME FOR ADVANCE!"  -   I'm tempted to order one for comedy value.

Anyone with eyes can see in the picture that it's fake - he's not selling a faked new/sealed super rare fake item - it's Mario Kart.  He's not trying to mislead, dupe, or rip anyone off.

Everytone has opinions over this, but it's all getting a little heated over not very much (and by heated i mean boring).  Can we all take a deep breath and relax a little?

 ;D

April 02, 2012, 11:32:19 AM
Reply #64

sadikyo

  • **
  • Information Offline
  • Jr. Member
  • Posts: 76
I'm actually enjoying the discussion and don't find it boring :)  As long as these two can keep it civil, I'd like to hear what they have to say.

After looking at the ebay seller though, it doesn't APPEAR that he is one of the really bad scumbags.  It is definitely possible that he isn't deliberately selling bootlegs, in which case, I'd hate to see his ebay reputation hurt.  However, if it has been brought to his attention that the game is fake, he should definitely go out of his way to make sure the buyer is satisfied (that's what I would do).

April 02, 2012, 11:59:17 AM
Reply #65

Patrick

  • *
  • Information Offline
  • Newbie++
  • Posts: 48
I may just keep it and not go through the hassel It was just $14.  I bought a real copy anyways and will just have to watchout and look at the pictures closely.
« Last Edit: April 02, 2012, 12:02:38 PM by Patrick »

April 02, 2012, 01:12:55 PM
Reply #66

FFXIK

  • ***
  • Information Offline
  • Full Member
  • Posts: 141
I may just keep it and not go through the hassel It was just $14.  I bought a real copy anyways and will just have to watchout and look at the pictures closely.

I kept both Breath of Fire II and Dragon Quest I & II bootlegs as a reminder.  That if you succumb to impulsive buys you need to be very wary of what it is your buying.  That and bootlegs are not only had online but can also be found at the local shops as well.
Let the seller go to the police.

I can see the complaint now.

 "Well, I was selling this counterfeit game on eBay when..."

The same can be said for your repeated proclamations regarding the illegality of shipping counterfeit items via USPS.  Call the FBI regarding this transaction and see where it gets you.

My point wasn't that it's something that should be reported, but rather that your instructions were rather hypocritical.

Also, see my edit above.

It's actually funny you should say that Wiggy.  I called the FBI in regards to a anime bootlegging site here in Missouri, and it by no means is a small operation.  They told me flat out there was nothing they would do, and to quit wasting their time.
« Last Edit: April 02, 2012, 01:14:35 PM by FFXIK »

April 02, 2012, 04:20:12 PM
Reply #67

wiggy

  • The one.. the only... whatever
  • **
  • Information Offline
  • Maximum Volume Poster
  • Posts: 8241
  • Extra cheese please!
    • Rose Colored Gaming
LOL! 

They've got FAAAAAR bigger fish to fry ;)  Hell, even local authorities wouldn't care about something like this if it fell within their jurisdiction.


I actually sent a pm to Bob earlier.  I'm not umad?, e-raging, or anything like that.  I'm always down for competent, civil debate.  I only wanted to clarify that, and to make sure that it's not getting under his skin or anything ;)

April 02, 2012, 06:13:29 PM
Reply #68

FFXIK

  • ***
  • Information Offline
  • Full Member
  • Posts: 141
LOL! 

They've got FAAAAAR bigger fish to fry ;)  Hell, even local authorities wouldn't care about something like this if it fell within their jurisdiction.


I actually sent a pm to Bob earlier.  I'm not umad?, e-raging, or anything like that.  I'm always down for competent, civil debate.  I only wanted to clarify that, and to make sure that it's not getting under his skin or anything ;)

Although now that I think about it I should have called up Funimation and a host of other anime related companies I'm sure they could have done something.

I enjoy a nice calm intellectual debate.  I tend to come off as more snarky than I intend.  I re-read some of my posts here, I come across as an asshole, not intentionally mind you.
« Last Edit: April 02, 2012, 06:16:58 PM by FFXIK »

April 03, 2012, 12:43:30 AM
Reply #69

Patrick

  • *
  • Information Offline
  • Newbie++
  • Posts: 48
Nintendo must really not care for their products being bootleged as I still havn't heard from them. probably because its a out of service game.

April 03, 2012, 07:41:49 AM
Reply #70

wiggy

  • The one.. the only... whatever
  • **
  • Information Offline
  • Maximum Volume Poster
  • Posts: 8241
  • Extra cheese please!
    • Rose Colored Gaming
Honestly, their response is going to be just like the FBI's.  They don't have time to try and track down every single person selling a bootleg copy of one of their games.  If they're gonna go after anyone, it'll be the manufacturer of the counterfeit games.

You guys have to understand that this shit is absolutely not worthwhile for Nintendo to pursue.  Can you imagine them going after every mom & pop shop, every eBay seller, every guy on craigslist, etc. that sell illegal copies of their games?  It's just not worth their time and money.

April 03, 2012, 07:57:29 AM
Reply #71

sadikyo

  • **
  • Information Offline
  • Jr. Member
  • Posts: 76
Yep.  And it'd be one thing if it was Zelda: Skyward Sword, or some other new game that they are selling, but they aren't really "losing" much here.  There is an argument with the DS counterfeits I suppose, but it still isn't worth it for them to pursue.

April 03, 2012, 08:08:00 AM
Reply #72

wiggy

  • The one.. the only... whatever
  • **
  • Information Offline
  • Maximum Volume Poster
  • Posts: 8241
  • Extra cheese please!
    • Rose Colored Gaming
Yup, exactly.  If it's a GBA title, then it's very likely that it's not available at retail.  While they don't want their IP stolen, they aren't technically losing money in the most direct sense. 

April 03, 2012, 10:49:16 AM
Reply #73

UncleBob

  • *************
  • Information Offline
  • Hero Member
  • Forum Admin
  • Posts: 925
    • Email
No, we're cool.  Though, again, I'm not a hypocrite.  If I said "You shouldn't send it through the mail because it's illegal.", then, yeah, that'd be hypocritical,  But I'm not - I'm saying don't return it through the mail because you don't want to return it to them - and the excuse is because it's illegal.  The fact that it's illegal is a very good excuse because - even if law enforcement doesn't care - no one can make breaking federal law a requirement of any kind of agreement.

As for the FBI - No, calling them isn't going to do much of anything.  You're not the copyright holder.  The one who's properties are being infringed upon has to be the one to file the complaint.

Nintendo could go after these resellers on eBay - but, in general, it's not worth their time (the one I sent the counterfeit games in regarding, it turned out, was running a website on the side with every single Game Boy Advance title - and then some - for $14.95... Guess Nintendo thought that one might be worth it - the site no longer exists).

Quote
I may just keep it and not go through the hassel It was just $14.

And another bootlegger wins.  This is what they count on - Moms buying games for their kiddies and folks who just don't care enough to follow through...

Quote
How many times have you been involved in civil and/or criminal litigation?
...actually, quite a bit. :D

Quote
Sorry, friend, law is absolutely NOT black and white.  It is up to interpretation, and that interpretation will vary greatly from officer to officer, prosecutor to prosecutor, judge to judge, etc.

You just contradicted yourself.
The law, generally, *is* black and white.  It's the individuals that interpret it.

Perfect example - if the posted speed limit is 55, then the speed limit is 55.  You can't go 56 without breaking the law.  Now, you're very, very unlikely to be pulled over.  More unlikely to get a ticket.  Most unlikely to have that ticket upheld in court if you fight it.  But that doesn't mean you're not breaking the law (short of any states that might have something written on the books that give you leeway...)  By not pulling you over, not giving you a ticket, or not holding you responsible for the ticket, no one is saying you didn't break the law...  they're simply saying that they're not going to punish you for it.

Quote
"Free money"?!  You have definitely never been a party to civil litigation.  Free is not a word that is USED in that context. Ever.

True - however, do some searches for lawsuits against PayPal - you'll find several folks who have won small claims court suits against PayPal - easily.  And there's likely to be several more, as when PayPal loses, they try to bribe/trick folks into signing a confidentiality agreement so they can't share their story.
« Last Edit: April 03, 2012, 10:53:39 AM by UncleBob »
theunclebob@hotmail.com - 618.384.6938